Posts Tagged ‘closed-end’

Management Fee of FAP (Aberdeen Asia Pacific Income Fund)

May 15th, 2010

Aberdeen Management

We have been quite interesting with a closed-end fund, called Aberdeen Asia Pacific Income Investment Fund (TSE:FAP). This fund invests mostly in government bonds of Asia Pacific countries, such as Australia and emerging market countries, such as Indonesia, India, Mexico and Brazil.

There seems to be a similar fund traded in American Stock Exchange, i.e. FAX. Their top holdings are a little bit different; so their dividends are also not the same. Furthermore, these funds are not currency-hedged, meaning there is a risk of currency fluctuation. That’s why; the return of Canadian funds is much worse compared to the American fund. I guess this is mainly due to stronger Canadian dollar recently.

Why are we interested in the Canadian fund (FAP)? The only reason is because Canadian dollar is our “native currency”. We work in Canada and earn money in Canadian dollar. So, it is easier to invest in Canadian fund.

After doing a little research on Aberdeen’s web site, we could not find the management fee of this fund. Management fee is one of our criteria before investing in a fund. We tried to look at the number from Globe and Mail database; and the number is not there either.

Then, we did search on CEFConnect. Unfortunately, we could only get the data for the American fund. We got the following number:

  • Management Fees: 0.70%
  • Other Expenses: 0.67%
  • Interest Expense: 0.82%
  • Total: 2.20%

The total expense for this fund is more than 2%, which we think it is pretty high. We assume the management fee of the Canadian fund (FAP) is more or less the same.

What is our conclusion then? Since the management fee seems to be very high, we decided not to invest in this fund.

Comparing Closed-end Funds that Replicates S&P 500′s

March 4th, 2010

We mentioned in our previous posting that we allocate a small amount of our portfolio into closed-end funds. We also recommend you to do research before buying closed-end funds because they tend to be more expensive than ETFs. Besides, some closed-end funds use leverage which will add risk.

We would like to compare a couple of closed-end funds that track S&P 500, i.e.:

All those three funds are basically buying stocks in S&P 500. They tried to outperform S&P 500 by writing options (covered call). That’s why; if you look at their fact sheets, they pay very high dividend. BlackRock’s Enhanced Capital and Income Fund, for example, pays 12.64% dividend. Yes, it’s double-digit dividend.

Now, let’s compare the performance of those funds to SPY, which is the biggest ETF that replicates S&P 500. As you can see, none of those funds can beat SPY in the long run. From year 2007 until today, here are the return of those funds:

  • CII: –25.05%
  • ETB: –22.37%
  • JCE: –39.67%
  • SPY: –21.44%

Of course, if you choose the right funds, the overall return including dividend might be higher than SPY.

Comparing closed-end funds for S&P 500

Switch to our mobile site